
You know, I’d have a lot more respect…
…for The National Review if that’d just, you know, be forthright about their desire to bomb Iran. This editorial is so goddamn passive-aggressive.
Iran won’t stop so long as there is no price to its acts of war. The controversy over Lieberman’s remark shows how we aren’t prepared to make it pay one.
Yeah, and…?

Iran won’t stop so long as there is no price to its acts of war. The controversy over Lieberman’s remark shows how we aren’t prepared to make it pay one.
So, basically, because Iran isn’t sacrificing anything, sorta like our right wing, we ought to “draft” them into doing so?
Works for me, so long as, you know, that “drafting” thing works both ways…